The idea alludes to a cruel demand for compensation, insisting on the success of a debt even when it causes excessive hardship or struggling to the debtor. This phrase originates from William Shakespeare’s play, The Service provider of Venice, the place a personality calls for a literal cost as stipulated in a contract. Such a contract requires dire penalties upon failure, emphasizing the extreme and doubtlessly inhumane enforcement of agreements.
Its significance lies in illustrating the risks of strict adherence to the letter of the regulation with out contemplating the moral implications. It serves as a cautionary story about greed, revenge, and the potential for authorized techniques to be exploited to inflict cruelty. Traditionally, it has been used to critique exploitative lending practices and the inflexible utility of contractual obligations that disregard equity and compassion.
