The desired location inside Harper Lee’s novel, “To Kill a Mockingbird,” incorporates a big alternate through the trial of Tom Robinson. Particularly, it options a part of Bob Ewell’s testimony below cross-examination by Atticus Finch. This part is essential as a result of it reveals inconsistencies and contradictions in Ewell’s account of the alleged assault, elevating doubts about his credibility.
This portion of the narrative is significant for understanding the themes of prejudice, justice, and ethical braveness prevalent all through the guide. The occasions detailed illuminate the racial bias current throughout the group of Maycomb and exhibit Atticus Finch’s dedication to defending reality and equity, even within the face of overwhelming social strain. It serves as a microcosm of the bigger societal inequalities depicted within the novel and their impression on particular person lives.
Evaluation of the dialogue and descriptions discovered at this level permits for a deeper understanding of the characters concerned and the advanced social dynamics at play within the courtroom. Additional examination permits one to dissect the impression of the testimony on the unfolding occasions and contemplate its contribution to the general message of the narrative.
1. Bob Ewell’s Testimony
The testimony of Bob Ewell because it unfolds on the specified location constitutes a important juncture within the Tom Robinson trial. It’s by way of Atticus Finch’s examination of Ewell that inconsistencies and potential falsehoods in his account start to floor, shaping the jury’s notion and impacting the trajectory of the narrative.
-
Inconsistent Narrative
Ewell’s account of the occasions previous the alleged assault on Mayella incorporates ambiguities and contradictions, significantly relating to the sequence of occasions and the precise particulars of Mayella’s accidents. Atticus’s questioning exposes these inconsistencies, elevating doubts concerning the veracity of Ewell’s claims. In actual authorized instances, inconsistent testimonies are sometimes used to undermine a witness’s credibility, as is the intent on this occasion.
-
Contradictory Claims of Mayella’s Harm
The precise description of Mayella Ewell’s accidents, together with the facet of her face that was bruised, turns into a degree of competition. Atticus strategically focuses on the placement of those accidents to counsel that they had been inflicted by somebody who’s left-handed. This element straight challenges Ewell’s assertion that Tom Robinson, who has a crippled left arm, was the assailant. Figuring out contradictory damage claims typically performs an important position in forensic investigations, influencing the willpower of guilt or innocence.
-
Atticus Finch’s Cross-Examination Strategies
Atticus’s technique of questioning Ewell demonstrates his authorized acumen and strategic strategy to uncovering the reality. He skillfully guides Ewell into revealing inconsistencies and biases by way of seemingly innocuous inquiries. This method is a trademark of efficient cross-examination, aiming to reveal the witness’s motives and reliability. Attorneys in real-world situations make use of comparable methods to problem witness testimonies and reveal underlying biases.
-
Ewell’s Underlying Prejudice
Ewell’s testimony is saturated with racial slurs and derogatory remarks in direction of Tom Robinson, exposing his deep-seated prejudice. This prejudice will not be merely private however displays the widespread racial bias prevalent in Maycomb society, influencing his notion of occasions and his motivation to accuse Tom. Prejudice, whether or not overt or implicit, stays a big think about quite a few authorized instances, influencing jury choices and perpetuating systemic inequalities.
These aspects of Bob Ewell’s testimony throughout the specified web page vary spotlight the complexities of reality, justice, and prejudice. The contradictions and biases revealed throughout Atticus’s cross-examination underscore the challenges of in search of justice in a society marred by inequality and pre-conceived notions. This testimony serves as a pivotal second within the narrative, influencing the reader’s understanding of the characters’ motivations and the broader themes of the novel.
2. Atticus’s Cross-Examination
Atticus Finch’s cross-examination of Bob Ewell, detailed particularly on that exact location, is a cornerstone of the Tom Robinson trial in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird.” This authorized maneuver exposes important inconsistencies in Ewell’s testimony, highlighting the racial prejudices at play and difficult the prevailing societal biases inside Maycomb.
-
Unveiling Inconsistencies in Ewell’s Account
Atticus’s strategic questioning methodically unveils discrepancies in Ewell’s narrative. The main points surrounding Mayella Ewell’s accidents, the sequence of occasions, and Ewell’s location through the alleged assault are rigorously examined. Related ways are employed in real-world authorized settings to undermine witness credibility. By highlighting these inconsistencies, Atticus casts doubt on the veracity of Ewell’s claims, elevating considerations concerning the validity of the prosecution’s case.
-
Exposing Racial Bias and Prejudice
Throughout the cross-examination, Ewell’s deeply rooted racial prejudices change into evident by way of derogatory language and biased assumptions about Tom Robinson. This displays the pervasive racism inside Maycomb society, the place the phrase of a white man, no matter his character, is commonly prioritized over that of a Black man. Actual-world parallels exist in instances the place racial bias influences authorized proceedings, leading to unjust outcomes. The cross-examination reveals how private biases can distort perceptions and impression the pursuit of justice.
-
Highlighting Ewell’s Lack of Credibility
Atticus’s adept questioning reveals Ewell’s lack of credibility, positioning him as an unreliable witness. The inconsistencies in his testimony, mixed together with his evident prejudice, undermine his character and motivations. This strategic discrediting of a witness is a typical observe in authorized trials, aiming to steer the jury to query the validity of their claims. Within the context of that web page, it is a pivotal second to alter the course of the trial.
-
The Left-Handedness Revelation
A vital ingredient of the cross-examination entails Atticus probing Ewell’s means to write down together with his left hand. This element means that Mayella’s accidents, particularly these on the fitting facet of her face, may have been inflicted by a left-handed particular person, straight implicating Ewell himself. This revelation challenges Ewell’s model of occasions and strengthens the protection’s argument that Tom Robinson was not the assailant. Forensic proof and knowledgeable evaluation of accidents typically play a important position in felony investigations, mirroring Atticus’s cautious consideration of bodily particulars.
The aspects of Atticus’s cross-examination, as evidenced, collectively serve to reveal the issues within the prosecution’s case and underscore the pervasive racial injustices prevalent in Maycomb. By skillfully questioning Ewell and highlighting the inconsistencies in his testimony, Atticus makes an attempt to degree the enjoying subject and advocate for a good trial for Tom Robinson, illustrating the complexities of reality, justice, and prejudice throughout the context of the novel.
3. Contradictions Uncovered
The phase recognized by the specification offers a important illustration of contradictions throughout the testimony of Bob Ewell. These inconsistencies usually are not merely minor discrepancies however characterize basic flaws in his account of the occasions surrounding Mayella Ewell’s alleged assault. The extraction of those contradictions is the direct results of Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, the place centered questioning reveals inconsistencies in Ewell’s story, impacting his general credibility as a witness. For instance, the shifting particulars of the accidents Mayella sustained and the timeline of occasions main as much as the alleged assault change into factors of competition when scrutinized. These contradictions function an important element as a result of they supply cheap doubt, difficult the prosecution’s narrative and creating the opportunity of Tom Robinson’s innocence.
These contradictions are demonstrably essential as a result of they permit the jury to evaluate the reliability of Ewell’s claims. Actual-world authorized proceedings typically hinge on the credibility of witnesses; exposing contradictions of their testimony can alter the course of a trial. Moreover, the main points revealed can have the sensible significance of adjusting the jurys notion of the folks concerned and to the motives behind the testimony. In felony instances, protection methods typically intention to spotlight conflicting statements or proof, simply as Atticus does right here, to exhibit that the prosecution’s case rests on shaky grounds.
In abstract, the uncovered contradictions usually are not an incidental ingredient however an important element of understanding the required passage. They’re the results of deliberate questioning, serve to undermine a key witness’s testimony, and carry important weight within the context of the trial’s broader themes of reality, justice, and prejudice. They underscore the inherent difficulties in acquiring justice inside a group pushed by bias and preconceived notions.
4. Ewell’s Credibility Questioned
The questioning of Bob Ewell’s credibility throughout the specified part is central to the unfolding narrative of “To Kill a Mockingbird.” This ingredient emerges straight from Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, the place discrepancies and inconsistencies in Ewell’s testimony are methodically revealed. The impression of this scrutiny is substantial, because it challenges the idea of the prosecution’s case in opposition to Tom Robinson, elevating doubts concerning the veracity of the accusations. An actual-world parallel exists in authorized settings, the place a witness’s lack of credibility can considerably affect a jury’s verdict, shifting the burden of proof and altering the course of a trial. In impact, the problem to Ewell’s credibility turns into a pivotal turning level, prompting the reader, and doubtlessly the jury throughout the novel’s context, to reassess the occasions primarily based on his account.
The importance of Ewell’s diminished credibility extends past the rapid authorized proceedings. It exposes the inherent prejudices and societal biases prevalent in Maycomb. Ewell’s unreliable testimony displays a broader sample of racial discrimination, the place the phrase of a white man, even one in all questionable character, is commonly valued above that of a Black man. This dynamic is mirrored in historic examples of racially biased court docket instances, the place prejudiced testimony has contributed to unjust convictions. The questioning of Ewell’s credibility, due to this fact, turns into a automobile for illustrating the systemic inequalities that underpin the trial and the group’s ethical panorama.
Finally, the challenges to Bob Ewell’s credibility, as they unfold inside that phase, serve to spotlight the complexities of reality, justice, and prejudice. The inconsistencies and biases uncovered throughout Atticus’s cross-examination underscore the challenges of in search of justice in a society marred by inequality and preconceived notions. This element of the textual content is a vital ingredient, affecting the story, influencing the reader’s understanding of the characters’ motivations, and reinforcing the broader themes of the narrative.
5. Mayella’s Harm Account
The testimony relating to Mayella Ewell’s accidents, as introduced within the specified textual phase, is central to the prosecution’s case in opposition to Tom Robinson. This account, delivered primarily by way of Bob Ewell’s testimony and meant to ascertain the character of the alleged assault, is topic to rigorous scrutiny and turns into a focus for Atticus Finch’s cross-examination.
-
Description of Accidents
The main points of Mayella’s accidents are described as primarily targeting the fitting facet of her face, particularly a black eye. This description is critical as a result of it suggests the assailant was seemingly left-handed, a element that turns into related when contemplating Tom Robinson’s bodily limitations. In real-world forensic evaluation, the placement and nature of accidents are important in figuring out the potential traits of the perpetrator.
-
Inconsistencies and Contradictions
The presentation of Mayella’s damage account incorporates inconsistencies that undermine its credibility. Atticus Finch skillfully attracts consideration to those contradictions, elevating doubts concerning the veracity of the testimony. Actual-world authorized proceedings typically hinge on the consistency of witness statements, and discrepancies can forged important doubt on all the narrative.
-
The Function of Prejudice
The acceptance of Mayella’s damage account is closely influenced by the racial prejudice prevalent in Maycomb. Regardless of the inconsistencies, the belief that Tom Robinson, a Black man, is responsible primarily based on his race alone performs a big position in shaping perceptions. Traditionally, biased assumptions have led to misinterpretations of proof and unjust verdicts in numerous instances.
-
Influence on the Trial’s End result
Mayella’s damage account, although questionable, contributes considerably to the trial’s final result. The jury, influenced by racial bias and swayed by the emotional nature of the testimony, in the end convicts Tom Robinson. This exemplifies how the presentation and interpretation of bodily proof could be manipulated to help predetermined conclusions, significantly within the presence of prejudice.
The intricacies of Mayella’s account, dissected by way of examination of this phase, reveal the advanced interaction of proof, prejudice, and notion throughout the justice system. It serves as a strong illustration of how societal biases can distort the pursuit of reality and affect the end result of authorized proceedings, additional highlighting the thematic considerations inside “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
6. Left-Handedness Element
The element relating to left-handedness, because it seems, is a important element of Atticus Finch’s cross-examination of Bob Ewell. This element arises straight from the testimony discovered at this juncture, the place Atticus questions Ewell about his means to write down together with his left hand. The importance stems from the bodily proof associated to Mayella Ewell’s accidents, significantly the bruising on the fitting facet of her face. The implication is {that a} left-handed particular person seemingly inflicted these accidents, contradicting Ewell’s accusation in opposition to Tom Robinson, whose left arm is crippled. This connection underscores the significance of seemingly minor particulars in revealing inconsistencies inside a witness’s testimony. An actual-world parallel exists in forensic investigations the place handedness is taken into account when analyzing crime scenes and suspect profiles.
The sensible significance lies in its means to problem the prevailing racial biases of the time. By introducing a believable various suspect, Atticus goals to create cheap doubt within the minds of the jury, forcing them to rethink their preconceived notions about Tom Robinson’s guilt. With out the deal with left-handedness, the jury could also be extra inclined to just accept Ewell’s account at face worth, furthering the unjust final result. The element connects on to Ewell’s motive for fabricating the story, shielding his personal potential involvement in Mayella’s accidents. The shortage of forensic experience might have affected the story on this scenario, provided that the accidents, although inconsistent, may have been investigated utilizing modern strategies.
In conclusion, the left-handedness element will not be an remoted level however a pivotal ingredient in Atticus Finch’s technique to reveal the contradictions and biases current within the trial. It illustrates the facility of forensic reasoning and its potential to disrupt established narratives, even within the face of deeply ingrained prejudice. Challenges to accepted social norms had been on the coronary heart of this element, contributing to the general exploration of societal injustice inherent in “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
7. Racial Prejudice Current
The desired textual content in Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” serves as a stark illustration of the pervasive racial prejudice deeply embedded throughout the societal cloth of Maycomb County. This prejudice manifests overtly by way of Bob Ewell’s testimony, the place his accusations in opposition to Tom Robinson are rooted in racist assumptions reasonably than concrete proof. Ewell’s willingness to manufacture a narrative and the benefit with which the group accepts his model of occasions spotlight the diminished worth positioned on the lives and experiences of Black people throughout that period. The prejudiced attitudes current contribute on to the injustice confronted by Tom Robinson, influencing the jury’s notion and in the end resulting in his wrongful conviction. Traditionally, comparable situations have unfolded in numerous instances the place racial bias has tainted authorized proceedings, leading to discriminatory outcomes.
The significance of recognizing the racial prejudice displayed at this level within the narrative is important for understanding the novel’s broader themes. It permits for a deeper examination of the facility dynamics at play, the place racial biases override purpose and equity. The cross-examination of Bob Ewell, meant to disclose inconsistencies in his testimony, is continually overshadowed by the unstated assumption of Tom Robinson’s guilt primarily based solely on his race. This prejudiced atmosphere underscores the systemic inequalities that exist inside Maycomb’s authorized and social constructions. Consciousness of this prejudice necessitates a important evaluation of how implicit biases can affect judgments and perpetuate discriminatory practices in real-world contexts, not restricted to the previous. Related influences proceed to occur immediately in much less overtly racist circumstances.
Understanding the connection between racial prejudice and the occasions described is important for recognizing the novel’s enduring relevance. The challenges introduced on this a part of the guide provide insights into the complexities of combating ingrained societal biases and the difficulties related to reaching true justice and equality. The presence of racial prejudice will not be merely a backdrop to the narrative; it’s a central driving drive that shapes the characters’ actions, influences the trial’s final result, and underscores the continued battle for racial equality. This phase of the guide affords a priceless alternative to replicate on the impression of prejudice and the significance of actively difficult discriminatory beliefs and practices.
8. Trial’s Pivotal Second
The phase marked by the reference inside Harper Lees “To Kill a Mockingbird” constitutes a pivotal second within the Tom Robinson trial. Particularly, it encompasses Atticus Finch’s rigorous cross-examination of Bob Ewell. This interrogation exposes important inconsistencies inside Ewell’s testimony, straight difficult his credibility and the validity of his accusations in opposition to Robinson. The meticulous unraveling of Ewell’s narrative, achieved by way of exact questioning, marks a turning level within the reader’s notion of the case and the chance of Robinson’s guilt. The implications of this testimony have a profound impression. This singular level is significant in understanding the trials evolution as a result of it units in movement a sequence of doubt that challenges the prevailing racial biases throughout the courtroom and the Maycomb group. An actual-life parallel could be drawn to numerous authorized instances the place a witness’s testimony, when scrutinized, reveals important flaws, subsequently altering the course of the trial and influencing the jury’s deliberation. The efficient questioning of the plaintiff is an try at exhibiting the jury he isn’t a dependable man.
The sensible significance of recognizing this second as pivotal lies in its illustration of the facility of authorized technique and the significance of due course of. Atticus Finch’s strategy demonstrates the essential position of a protection legal professional in advocating for the accused, significantly within the face of overwhelming societal prejudice. The courtroom setting, often biased to imagine the plaintiff has no sick intentions, is turned the wrong way up by Atticus Finch’s technique. The element can be essential when understanding extra real-life instances in court docket the place justice is required most. The revelations on the phase underscore the fragility of justice when influenced by bias. The element serves as a case research of how expert authorized ways can doubtlessly problem prejudiced assumptions, even inside a system stacked in opposition to the defendant.
Finally, phase illustrates a turning level not solely throughout the narrative of “To Kill a Mockingbird” but additionally throughout the broader themes of justice, prejudice, and ethical braveness. It highlights the challenges inherent in confronting societal biases and the enduring significance of in search of reality within the face of adversity. The trial, though in the end leading to an unjust verdict, showcases the opportunity of difficult entrenched prejudices, even inside a flawed authorized system. This particular phase acts as a microcosm of the bigger battle for equality and justice. It serves as a cautionary story concerning the ease with which prejudice can distort perceptions and the need of remaining vigilant within the pursuit of reality and equity. Nevertheless, this additionally illustrates the issue of adjusting a group’s perception on racial points, as they’re much less prone to ever present they modified their thoughts.
9. Injustice Manifested
The intersection of the described passage of Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” and the theme of “Injustice Manifested” is direct and profound. On that phase, the trial of Tom Robinson is in progress. Bob Ewell’s testimony, and Atticus Finch’s try to deliver out its fallacies, is a transparent demonstration of racial prejudice and the shortage of equal therapy below the regulation, that’s to say, injustice. Particularly, the main points introduced in Ewell’s testimony, the biases inherent in the neighborhood’s notion of Robinson, and the flawed authorized course of collectively contribute to an atmosphere the place injustice prevails. The element of the phase turns into a microcosm of the systemic inequalities that permeate Maycomb society, showcasing the tangible penalties of prejudice inside a authorized framework.
The understanding of this connection has sensible significance in analyzing historic and modern parallels. In real-world examples, such because the Scottsboro Boys case of the Nineteen Thirties, racial bias performed a decisive position in wrongful convictions. The failings throughout the authorized system are, many occasions, used to discriminate on a racial motive. It’s doable to see many instances which have led to harmless males serving prolonged sentences and later being acquitted. Equally, instances involving coerced confessions or unreliable eyewitness testimony typically exhibit how injustice can manifest inside authorized proceedings. By recognizing the patterns of bias and flawed reasoning depicted in, authorized professionals and social justice advocates can work to establish and deal with comparable points in trendy authorized techniques, selling equity and fairness.
In conclusion, the presence of “Injustice Manifested” within the location specified will not be merely a thematic ingredient however a central element of the narrative’s commentary on societal inequalities. The challenges lie in recognizing and dismantling the ingrained prejudices that enable such injustices to persist. By understanding the connection between the occasions that occur and the outcomes that resulted from them, people can change into higher geared up to advocate for systemic change and be certain that authorized techniques try for simply and equitable outcomes for all members of society.
Regularly Requested Questions Relating to Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird,” Particular Web page
The next questions deal with widespread factors of inquiry and supply detailed explanations relating to the related phase.
Query 1: What transpires on the recognized web page of “To Kill a Mockingbird”?
The phase incorporates a portion of Bob Ewell’s testimony through the Tom Robinson trial. It facilities on Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, the place inconsistencies in Ewell’s account start to floor. The dialogue entails the character of Mayella Ewell’s accidents and the occasions main as much as the alleged assault.
Query 2: Why is Ewell’s testimony on the required web page thought-about important?
Ewell’s testimony is essential as a result of it units the stage for questioning his credibility. The uncovered inconsistencies function a basis for suggesting that his model of occasions is fabricated. His testimony, influenced by racial prejudice, types the idea for the prosecution’s case, making its examination important to understanding the trial’s dynamics.
Query 3: What inconsistencies are revealed throughout Atticus Finch’s cross-examination?
Atticus focuses on discrepancies inside Ewell’s account of Mayella’s accidents, particularly the facet of her face that was bruised. This results in the revelation that the accidents may have been inflicted by a left-handed particular person, a element that contradicts Ewell’s claims given Tom Robinson’s bodily limitations.
Query 4: How does the ingredient of left-handedness have an effect on the trial?
The left-handedness element introduces cheap doubt relating to Tom Robinson’s guilt. It means that Bob Ewell, who’s doubtlessly left-handed, may have been the precise assailant. This revelation challenges the jury’s presumptions primarily based on racial bias and the Ewell household’s social standing.
Query 5: In what methods does racial prejudice affect the occasions depicted on this part?
Racial prejudice underpins all the trial and is clear in Ewell’s accusations. The presumption of Tom Robinson’s guilt, solely primarily based on his race, permeates the courtroom ambiance and influences the jury’s notion of the proof. The group’s acceptance of Ewell’s testimony, regardless of its inconsistencies, is a direct manifestation of this prejudice.
Query 6: What broader themes does this part of the guide exemplify?
This excerpt embodies a number of themes central to “To Kill a Mockingbird,” together with justice, injustice, prejudice, and ethical braveness. It highlights the complexities of in search of reality in a society marred by racial bias and the challenges of upholding moral ideas within the face of societal strain. The phase successfully demonstrates the vulnerability of marginalized people inside a flawed authorized system.
The evaluation offers perception into the intricate particulars and their broader implications.
The subsequent part explores the broader themes.
Navigating Advanced Testimony
The cross-examination of Bob Ewell offers priceless insights into analyzing and deciphering advanced witness testimony. Understanding the nuances of this alternate enhances comprehension of authorized methods and societal biases current inside “To Kill a Mockingbird.”
Tip 1: Determine Inconsistencies. Discrepancies inside a witness’s account are key indicators of potential falsehoods. Scrutinize timelines, bodily descriptions, and sequences of occasions for conflicting particulars. Atticus Finch successfully employed this method to undermine Ewell’s narrative.
Tip 2: Acknowledge the Affect of Bias. Preconceived notions and prejudices can considerably skew perceptions. Consider how societal biases would possibly have an effect on a witness’s statements and the reception of these statements by others. Bob Ewell’s racist attitudes coloured his testimony, influencing the jury’s preliminary impressions.
Tip 3: Think about the Supply’s Credibility. Assess the witness’s character, background, and potential motivations. Decide if they’ve any vested pursuits or causes to distort the reality. Ewell’s lack of credibility stemmed from his historical past of dishonesty and his want to guard his status.
Tip 4: Analyze Physique Language and Demeanor. Nonverbal cues can present extra perception right into a witness’s truthfulness. Observe any indicators of nervousness, hesitation, or defensiveness. Whereas not explicitly described, inferences about Ewell’s demeanor could be drawn from his evasive responses.
Tip 5: Perceive the Context of the Setting. Acknowledge the historic, social, and authorized setting of the examination in progress. How do the biases, if there are any, impact the way in which that one interprets testimony. The time of the testimony and the situations of the trial, would possibly impact its final result.
Tip 6: Pay Consideration to Particulars. Particulars typically make up what composes the massive image. The main points within the testitomy must be examined totally, even when it seems trivial at first. The handedness instance is a transparent indicator {that a} tiny element can affect the narrative.
Cautious consideration to inconsistencies, biases, credibility, and surrounding circumstances permits for a extra thorough understanding. These factors are key when comprehending the nuances of authorized proceedings, be it in a courtroom or from a piece of fiction. When analyzing these key components, the understanding of a witness turns into extra clear, and exhibits how that affect involves be within the narrative.
The understanding permits for a deeper appreciation of the themes explored in “To Kill a Mockingbird,” with a specific deal with the fallacies inside human notion.
Evaluation of the Bob Ewell Testimony
The examination of the required textual content from Harper Lee’s “To Kill a Mockingbird” reveals a important juncture within the Tom Robinson trial. The phase, specializing in Bob Ewell’s testimony and Atticus Finch’s cross-examination, highlights inconsistencies, prejudices, and the fragility of reality inside a biased authorized system. Key components resembling the outline of Mayella’s accidents, the introduction of the left-handedness element, and the overt show of racial prejudice all contribute to a deeper understanding of the novel’s central themes. The evaluation underscores the significance of scrutinizing witness testimonies, recognizing societal biases, and advocating for justice within the face of adversity.
The occasions that unfold in “To Kill a Mockingbird” function a reminder of the enduring want for vigilance within the pursuit of equity and fairness. Continued examination of the complexities on this phase permits the world to have higher evaluation on the present state of our society. The world can take perception to combat and forestall the injustices of any system or entity, be it judicial, political, or company.
